participation
Participation
Posted July 24th, 2008 by Armin Medosch| Publication Type | Book | |
| Citation Key | 648 | |
| Year of Publication | 2006 | |
| Authors | Bishop, Claire. | |
| City | London; Cambridge, Mass. | |
| Publisher | Whitechapel ; MIT Press | |
| Date Published | 2006/// | |
| Publication Language | eng | |
| ISBN Number | 0262524643 978026252464 |
ONE LOVE: How FLOSS Can Make True All the Promises of the Avantgarde (yet would kill 'art' by doing so)
Posted June 27th, 2008 by Armin MedoschIn his essay All problems of Notation Will be Solved by the Masses, Simon Yuill claims that the emergent practice of livecoding 'most directly embodies the key principles of FLOSS production into the creation and experience of the work itself.' Unfortunately this claim is supportet by an argumentation which is elitist, draws on the criterium of virtuosity and thereby stands in stark contrast to the culture of particpation that FLOSS has engendered. While his central argument is not supported, the piece offers enough food for thought to be considered interesting reading.
- Armin Medosch's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- Visit Simon Yuill's article in Mute Magazine
Conclusions
Posted October 8th, 2007 by Armin MedoschWe live in an extraordinary time when the democratic cornucopia of media is very close to becoming reality and where there are hardly any technical barriers, and if there are the free software community will be capable of solving them. Yet the power elites have already found ways of either subverting that and subverting the creative impulse and the desire of the people, or they are simply moving the goalposts by reminding us that they have naked force on their side.
The Internet as Democratic Media Cornucopia
Posted October 8th, 2007 by Armin MedoschThe 20th century can be understood along the lines of a process of democratization of access to media and the means of cultural production. Things that originally were the privilege of social elites only became accessible for a much greater number of people. At the beginning of the 20th century access to education and knowledge was restricted as well as access to high culture. People from lower income classes had insufficient means of participating in the democratic process because they were either not allowed to vote or they did not have an opportunity to get an informed opinion.
The Decline of the Public Sphere
Posted October 8th, 2007 by Armin MedoschIn The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere Jürgen Habermas (1962/1990) gives a historic account of the formation of the public sphere and its decline. There he argues that in the feudal system, while public events did happen, they were merely of a representational character. Everybody was present, but in a representational capacity only, there was no public discourse, no difference of opinion was allowed and all actual power was centralized in the institution of the souvereign/monarch. The events of public life followed a strict ceremonial protocol.